Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 28: e20190720, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1134776

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective This study evaluated the clinical effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching used alone or combined with 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) or 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). Methodology A total of 100 patients were divided into five groups (n=20): LED, LED/CP, CP, LED/HP and HP. Colorimetric evaluation was performed using a spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔL, Δa, Δb) and a visual shade guide (ΔSGU). Calcium (Ca)/phosphorous (P) ratio was quantified in the enamel microbiopsies. Measurements were performed at baseline (T 0 ), after bleaching (T B ) and in the 14-day follow-up (T 14 ). At each bleaching session, a visual scale determined the absolute risk (AR) and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS). Data were evaluated by one-way (ΔE, Δa, ΔL, Δb), two-way repeated measures ANOVA (Ca/P ratio), and Tukey post-hoc tests. ΔSGU and TS were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney, and AR by Chi-Squared tests (a=5%). Results LED produced the lowest ΔE (p<0.05), but LED/HP promoted greater ΔE, ΔSGU and Δb (T 14 ) than HP (p<0.05). No differences were observed in ΔE and ΔSGU for LED/CP and HP groups (p>0.05). ΔL and Δa were not influenced by LED activation. After bleaching, LED/CP exhibited greater Δb than CP (p>0.05), but no differences were found between these groups at T 14 (p>0.05). LED treatment promoted the lowest risk of TS (16%), while HP promoted the highest (94.4%) (p<0.05). No statistical differences of risk of TS were found for CP (44%), LED/CP (61%) and LED/HP (88%) groups (p>0.05). No differences were found in enamel Ca/P ratio among treatments, regardless of evaluation times. Conclusions Violet LED alone produced the lowest bleaching effect, but enhanced HP bleaching results. Patients treated with LED/CP reached the same efficacy of HP, with reduced risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and none of the bleaching protocols adversely affected enamel mineral content.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Phototherapy/methods , Tooth Bleaching/methods , Tooth Bleaching Agents/administration & dosage , Carbamide Peroxide/administration & dosage , Hydrogen Peroxide/administration & dosage , Light , Reference Values , Spectrophotometry , Surface Properties/drug effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Risk Factors , Analysis of Variance , Treatment Outcome , Colorimetry , Combined Modality Therapy , Statistics, Nonparametric , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Dentin Sensitivity/chemically induced
2.
J. appl. oral sci ; 28: e20190693, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1134791

ABSTRACT

Abstract Debonding, staining and wear are usually the reasons for denture teeth replacement by new ones from same or different brands. Objective This study investigates the possible differences in color of denture teeth of the same or different brands under different illuminations, since their metameric behavior in color under specific illumination may become unacceptable. Methodology For the purpose of this study, 10 denture teeth (#11), shade A3, of 4 different brands were selected (Creopal/KlemaDental Pro, Executive/DeguDent, Cosmo HXL/DeguDent, Ivostar/Ivoclar-Vivadent). Teeth stabilized in white silicone mold and the CIELAB color coordinates of their labial surface under 3 different illumination lights (D65, F2, A) were recorded, using a portable colorimeter (FRU/WR-18, Wave Inc). ΔE*ab values of all possible pairs of teeth of the same brand (n=45) or pair combinations of different brands (n=100) under each illumination light, in a dry and wet state were calculated. Data were analyzed statistically using 3-way ANOVA, Friedman's and Wilcoxon's tests at a significance level of α=0.05. Results The results showed that brand type affected significantly L*, a* and b* coordinates (p<0.0001), illumination a* and b* coordinates (p<0.0001), but none of them was affected by the hydration state of teeth (p>0.05). Intra-brand color differences ranged between 0.21-0.78ΔΕ* units with significant differences among brands (p<0.0001), among illumination lights (p<0.0001) and between hydration states (p=0.0001). Inter-brand differences ranged between 2.29-6.29ΔΕ* units with significant differences among pairs of brands (p<0.0001), illumination lights (p<0.0001) and hydration states (p<0.0001). Conclusions Differences were found between and within brands under D65 illumination which increased under F2 or A illumination affected by brand type and hydration status. Executive was the most stable brand than the others under different illuminations or wet states and for this reason its difference from other brands is the lowest. In clinical practice, there should be no blending of teeth of different brands but if we must, we should select those that are more stable under different illuminations


Subject(s)
Humans , Lighting , Dentures , Prosthesis Coloring , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Materials Testing , Analysis of Variance , Colorimetry , Statistics, Nonparametric
3.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 34: e005, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1055521

ABSTRACT

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ionizing radiation from high energy X-ray on fluoride release, surface roughness, flexural strength, and surface chemical composition of the materials. The study groups comprised five different restorative materials: Beautifil II, GCP Glass Fill, Amalgomer CR, Zirconomer, and Fuji IX GP. Twenty disk-shaped specimens (8x2 mm) for fluoride release and 20 bar-shaped specimens (25 x 2x 2 mm) for flexural strength were prepared from each material. Each material group was divided into two subgroups: irradiated (IR) and non-irradiated (Non-IR). The specimens from IR groups were irradiated with 1.8 Gy/day for 39 days (total IR = 70.2 Gy). The amount of fluoride released into deionized water was measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode and ion analyzer after 24 hours and on days 2, 3, 7, 15, 21, 28, 35, and 39 (n = 10). The flexural strength was evaluated using the three-point bending test (n = 10). After the period of measurement of fluoride release, seven specimens (n = 7) from each group were randomly selected to evaluate surface roughness using AFM and one specimen was randomly selected for the SEM and EDS analyses. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p = 0.05). The irradiation significantly increased fluoride release and surface roughness for Amalgomer CR and Zirconomer groups (p < 0.05). No significant change in flexural strength of the materials was observed after irradiation (p > 0.05). The ionizing radiation altered the amount of fluoride release and surface roughness of only Amalgomer CR and Zirconomer. The effect could be related to the chemical compositions of materials.


Subject(s)
Apatites/radiation effects , Radiation, Ionizing , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Fluorides/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Apatites/chemistry , Reference Values , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Zirconium/radiation effects , Zirconium/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Composite Resins/chemistry , Flexural Strength , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry
4.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180126, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-975877

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bonding strength of non-simplified dentin bonding systems (DBS) to dentin irradiated with a diode laser (970 nm) immediately and after 12 months of water storage following either primer or bond application. Material and methods: The experimental design included three different factors: DBS type [AdperTM Scotchbond Multipurpose (MP) and Clearfil™ SE Bond (CSE)], irradiation [without irradiation - control (C), irradiation after primer application (AP), and irradiation after bond application (AB)], and time [initial (I) and after 12 months of water storage (12 m)]. Sixty sound human third molars (n = 10) were obtained, and their flat occlusal dentin areas were prepared and standardized. Laser irradiation was performed in the contact mode perpendicular to the dental surface over an automatically selected scanning area at a pulse energy of 0.8 W, frequency of 10 Hz, and energy density of 66.67 J/cm2. After 7 days of treatment, the specimens were cut, and half of them were subjected to microtensile testing (500 N/0.05 mm/min), whereas the remaining sticks were examined after 12 months of water storage. The obtained data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey test (p<0.05). The observed fracture modes were investigated using a portable digital microscope with a magnification of 40x. Results: Among the utilized DBS, MP generally exhibited higher bond strengths, but did not always differ from CSE under similar conditions. The irradiation factor was statistically significant only for the MP/AB groups. After 12 months of storage, all groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the bond strength, whereas the results of fracture analysis showed a predominance of the adhesive type. Conclusions: The laser treatment of non-simplified DBS was not able to stabilize their bonding characteristics after 12 months.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin-Bonding Agents/radiation effects , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Dentin/radiation effects , Lasers, Semiconductor , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Water/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Microscopy, Atomic Force , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dentin/drug effects , Polymerization/radiation effects
5.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180075, 2019. graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-975874

ABSTRACT

Abstract Currently, there is no consensus in terms of defining the minimum radiant exposure values necessary for achieving adequate properties of composite resin. In addition, the long-term influence that radiant exposure has on the properties of composite resins is still questionable. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of radiant exposure and UV accelerated aging on the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of micro-hybrid and nanofilled composite resins. Material and Methods: A nanofilled (Filtek Supreme; 3M ESPE) and a micro-hybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250; 3M ESPE) were investigated under different radiant exposures (3.75, 9, and 24 J/cm2) and UV accelerated aging protocols (0, 500, 1000, and 1500 aging hours). The degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS), modulus (M), water sorption (WS), and solubility (WL) were evaluated. The results obtained were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Comparisons were performed using a significance level of α=0.05. Results: The DC, FS, and M were found to be significantly influenced by both radiant exposure and accelerated aging time. The DC and EM increased with radiant exposure in the no-aging group (0-hour aging) for both micro-hybrid and nanofilled composites, whereas no correlation was found after accelerated aging protocols. WS and WL of micro-hybrid and nanofilled composite resins were scarcely affected by radiant exposure (p>0.05), whereas they were significantly reduced by accelerated aging (p<0.001). Conclusions: Although increasing radiant exposure affected the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of micro-hybrid and nanofilled composites, no influence on the hydrolytic degradation of the material was observed. In contrast, UV accelerated aging affected both the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of the composites.


Subject(s)
Ultraviolet Rays , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Solubility , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Water/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Analysis of Variance , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Phase Transition/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Photochemical Processes/radiation effects , Polymerization/drug effects , Flexural Strength/radiation effects
6.
An. acad. bras. ciênc ; 90(1): 195-204, Mar. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-886907

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Demand for medical implants is rising day by day as the world becomes the place for more diseased and older people. Accordingly, in this research, metallocene polyethylene (mPE), a commonly used polymer was treated with UV rays for improving its biocompatibility. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images confirmed the formation of crests and troughs, which depicts the improvement of surface roughness of mPE substrates caused by UV etching. Accordingly, the contact angle measurements revealed that the wettability of mPE-2.5 J/cm2 (68.09º) and mPE-5 J/cm2 (57.93º) samples were found to be increased compared to untreated mPE (86.84º) indicating better hydrophilicity. Further, the UV treated surface exhibited enhanced blood compatibility as determined in APTT (untreated mPE- 55.3 ± 2.5 s, mPE-2.5 J/cm2 - 76.7 ± 4.1 s and mPE-5 J/cm2 - 112.3 ± 2 s) and PT (untreated mPE - 24.7 ± 1.5 s, mPE- 2.5 J/cm2 - 34.3 ± 1.1 s and mPE-5 J/cm2 - 43 ± 2 s) assay. Moreover, the treated mPE-2.5 J/cm2 (4.88%) and mPE-5 J/cm2 (1.79%) showed decreased hemolytic percentage compared to untreated mPE (15.40%) indicating better safety to red blood cells. Interestingly, the changes in physicochemical properties of mPE are directly proportional to the dosage of the UV rays. UV modified mPE surfaces were found to be more compatible as identified through MTT assay, photomicrograph and SEM images of the seeded 3T3 cell population. Hence UV-modified surface of mPE may be successfully exploited for medical implants.


Subject(s)
Animals , Rabbits , Rats , Ultraviolet Rays , Materials Testing , Metallocenes/radiation effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Cattle , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , 3T3 Cells , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Metallocenes/chemistry , Hemolysis , Histocompatibility
7.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 32: e47, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952151

ABSTRACT

Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a UV light-based auxiliary illumination on adhesive remnant (AR) removal after orthodontic debonding. Sixty human molars were divided according to the adhesive used for bonding: O-opaque; LF-low fluorescence; and HF-high fluorescence. After debonding, the teeth were subdivided according to the AR removal method: No UV light or With UV light. After AR removal, the teeth were polished. Direct visual analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and time quantification for AR removal analyses were performed (Fisher-Freeman-Halton, Fisher's exact, chi-square trend, ANOVA, and independent t-tests; α = 5%). Concerning the adhesives, there was no significant difference among direct visual, SEM and time analyses for AR removal (p ≥ 0.05). Regarding AR removal methods, a similarity among the subgroups was verified for direct visual and SEM analyses (p≥0.05). However, a significant trend was verified for the with UV light method to produce greater marks, and the no UV light method, to produce a greater rate of samples with AR before polishing (p = 0.015). AR removal with light was significantly quicker in comparison with the no UV light method (p < 0.0001). The use of UV light may aid orthodontists in removing AR more thoroughly and in less time. However, they should receive special training to apply this technology, and should never dismiss the final polishing procedure.


Subject(s)
Humans , Orthodontic Appliances , Ultraviolet Rays , Dental Debonding/methods , Dental Cements/radiation effects , Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Polishing/methods
8.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 32: e121, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-974461

ABSTRACT

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of radiation therapy on root canal sealer push-out bond strength (BS) to dentin and the sealer/dentin interface after different final irrigation solutions (NaOCl, EDTA, and chitosan). Sixty-four maxillary canines were distributed into two groups (n=30): non-irradiated and irradiated with 60 Gy. Canals were prepared with Reciproc-R50 and subdivided (n=10) for final irrigation (NaOCl, EDTA, chitosan) and filled. Three dentin slices were obtained from each root third. The first slice of each third was selected for BS evaluation, and the failure mode was determined by stereomicroscopy. SEM analysis of the sealer-dentin interface was performed in the remaining slices. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α=0.05) were used. Lower BS (P<0.0001) was obtained after irradiation (2.07±0.79 MPa), regardless of the final irrigation solution used. The NaOCl group (P<0.001) had the lowest BS in the irradiated (1.68±0.72) and non-irradiated (2.39±0.89) groups, whereas the EDTA (irradiated: 2.14±0.77 and non-irradiated: 3.92±1.54) and chitosan (irradiated: 2.37±0.73 and non-irradiated: 3.51±1.47) groups demonstrated a higher BS (P<0.05). The highest values were observed in the coronal third (3.17±1.38) when compared to the middle (2.74±1.36) and apical ones (2.09±0.97)(P<0.0001). There were more cohesive failures and more gaps in irradiated specimens, regardless of the final solution. The present study showed that radiation was associated with a decrease in BS, regardless of the final solution used, whereas chitosan increased BS in teeth subjected to radiation therapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Root Canal Filling Materials/radiation effects , Root Canal Irrigants/radiation effects , Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin/drug effects , Dentin/radiation effects , Epoxy Resins/radiation effects , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Root Canal Irrigants/chemistry , Sodium Hypochlorite/chemistry , Surface Properties/drug effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Tooth Root/drug effects , Tooth Root/radiation effects , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Edetic Acid/chemistry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Dental Restoration Failure , Chitosan/chemistry , Epoxy Resins/chemistry , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy
9.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 32: e122, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-974460

ABSTRACT

Abstract: The effects of tooth brushing could affect the long-term esthetic outcome of composite restorations. This study evaluated the effect of two different emission spectrum light-curing units on the surface roughness, roughness profile, topography and microhardness of bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing. Valo (multiple-peak) and Demi Ultra (single-peak) curing lights were each used for 10s to polymerize three bulk-fill resin composites: Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TET) and Surefil SDR Flow (SDR). After 30,000 reciprocal strokes in a toothbrushing machine, the roughness profile, surface roughness, surface morphology, and microhardness were examined. Representative SEM images were also obtained. When light-cured with the Demi Ultra, SDR showed the most loss in volume compared to the other composites and higher volume loss compared to when was light-cured with Valo. The highest surface roughness and roughness profile values were found in SDR after toothbrushing, for both light-curing units tested. FBF always had the greatest microhardness values. Light-curing TET with Valo resulted in higher microhardness compared to when using the Demi Ultra. Confocal and SEM images show that toothbrushing resulted in smoother surfaces for FBF and TET. All composites exhibited surface volume loss after toothbrushing. The loss in volume of SDR depended on the light-curing unit used. Toothbrushing can alter the surface roughness and superficial aspect of some bulk-fill composites. The choice of light-curing unit did not affect the roughness profile, but, depending on the composite, it affected the microhardness.


Subject(s)
Toothbrushing/adverse effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Surface Properties/drug effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Microscopy, Confocal , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Polymerization , Hardness/drug effects , Hardness/radiation effects
10.
J. appl. oral sci ; 26: e20160662, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-893738

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The main goal of this study was to compare the polymerization degree of bulk-fill giomer resin cured with three different light-curing units (LCUs): a polywave third-generation (Valo); a monowave (DemiUltra: DU); and a second-generation LED (Optima 10: Opt) LCUs by using structural and mechanical properties. Material and methods: Giomer samples of 2 and 4 mm cured with three LCUs were employed in vitro analysis. The degree of curing (DC%) was determined with Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Microstructural features were observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Flexural strength (FS), compression strength (CS), elastic modulus and fracturing strain were determined for mechanical properties. Surface microhardness (SMH) values were also measured. Oneway ANOVA, two-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used for statistically analyzing the FS and SMH. Results: DC% values were 58.2, 47.6, and 39.7 for the 2 mm samples cured with DU, Opt., and Valo LCUs, respectively. DC% values of the 4 mm samples were 50.4, 44.6, and 38.2 for DU, Opt, and Valo, respectively. SMH values were Valo, Opt<DU at top of the samples; Valo<DU, Opt at 2 mm, and DU, Valo<Opt at 4 mm depth. Giomer samples cured with Opt and DU exhibited higher FS values than Valo. CS values were similar but compressive modulus and fracturing strain (%) varied depending on the curing protocol. Conclusions: Based on the results, it can be concluded that curing device and protocol strongly affect crosslinking reactions and thus DC%, SMH, compressive modulus and strain at break values. Consequently, it can be deduced that curing protocol is possibly the most important parameter for microstructure formation of highly-filled composite restoratives because it may bring some structural defects and physical frailties on restorations due to lower degree of polymerization.


Subject(s)
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Polymerization/radiation effects , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Statistics, Nonparametric , Compressive Strength , Elastic Modulus , Hardness Tests
11.
J. appl. oral sci ; 26: e20170029, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-893704

ABSTRACT

Abstract Literature has reported positive results regarding the use of lasers in the control of erosive lesions; however, evaluating whether they are effective in the control of the progression of erosive/abrasive lesions is important. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Er:YAG laser irradiation in controlling the progression of erosion associated with abrasive lesions in enamel. Material and methods Bovine incisors were sectioned, flattened and polished. Forty-eight enamel slabs were subjected to treatment in an intraoral phase. Twelve volunteers used an intraoral appliance containing one slab that was irradiated with an Er:YAG laser (5.2 J/cm2, 85 mJ, 2 Hz) and another non-irradiated slab on each side of the appliance, during one phase of 5 d, under a split-mouth design. Devices were subjected to erosive challenges (1% citric acid, 5 min, 3 times a day) and abrasive challenges one h after (brushing force of 1.5 N for 15 s) randomly and independently on each side of the device. Measurements of enamel loss were performed via 3D optical profilometry (μm). We analyzed data using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests and morphological characteristics via scanning electron microscopy. Results Following erosive and abrasive challenges, the group that was irradiated with the Er:YAG laser presented less loss of structure than the non-irradiated group. The group that underwent erosion and irradiation did not exhibit a significant difference from the non-irradiated group. Conclusion Irradiation with the Er:YAG laser did not control the loss of structure of enamel subjected to erosion but did control abrasion after erosion.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Tooth Abrasion/prevention & control , Tooth Erosion/prevention & control , Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric , Disease Progression , Citric Acid/chemistry , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Hardness Tests
12.
J. appl. oral sci ; 25(4): 381-386, July-Aug. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-893641

ABSTRACT

Abstract Simplified dentin-bonding systems are clinically employed for most adhesive procedures, and they are prone to hydrolytic degradation. Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of laser diode irradiation on the degree of conversion (DC), water sorption (WS), and water solubility (WSB) of these bonding systems in an attempt to improve their physico-mechanical resistance. Material and Methods Two bonding agents were tested: a two-step total-etch system [Adper™ Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE (SB)] and a universal system [Adper™ Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE (SU)]. Square-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned into 4 groups (n=5): SB and SU (control groups - no laser irradiation) and SB-L and SU-L [SB and SU laser (L) - irradiated groups]. DC was assessed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance. Additional uncured resin samples (≈3.0 µL, n=5) of each adhesive were also scanned for final DC calculation. For WS/WSB tests, similar specimens (n=10) were prepared and measured by monitoring the mass changes after dehydration/water storage cycles. For both tests, adhesive fluids were dropped into standardized Teflon molds (6.0×6.0×1.0 mm), irradiated with a 970-nm laser diode, and then polymerized with an LED-curing unit (1 W/cm2). Results Laser irradiation immediately before photopolymerization increased the DC (%) of the tested adhesives: SB-L>SB>SU-L>SU. For WS/WSB (μg/mm3), only the dentin bonding system (DBS) was a significant factor (p<0.05): SB>SU. Conclusion Irradiation with a laser diode improved the degree of conversion of all tested simplified dentin bonding systems, with no impact on water sorption and solubility.


Subject(s)
Dentin-Bonding Agents/radiation effects , Lasers, Semiconductor , Polymerization/radiation effects , Reference Values , Solubility/radiation effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Reproducibility of Results , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Statistics, Nonparametric , Dental Cements/radiation effects , Dental Cements/chemistry , Phase Transition/radiation effects , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Curing Lights, Dental , Photochemical Processes/radiation effects
13.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 31: e65, 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952107

ABSTRACT

Abstract The effect of restoration depth on the curing time of a conventional and two bulk-fill composite resins by measuring microhardness and the respective radiosity of the bottom surface of the specimen was investigated. 1-, 3- and 5-mm thick washers were filled with Surefil SDR Flow-U (SDR), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill-IVA (TEC) or Esthet-X HD-B1 (EHD), and cured with Bluephase® G2 for 40s. Additional 1-mm washers were filled with SDR, TEC or EHD, placed above the light sensor of MARC®, stacked with pre-cured 1-, 3- or 5-mm washer of respective material, and cured for 2.5~60s to mimic 2-, 4- and 6-mm thick composite curing. The sensor measured the radiosity (EB) at the bottom of specimen stacks. Vickers hardness (VH) was measured immediately at 5 locations with triplicate specimens. Nonlinear regression of VH vs EB by VH=α[1-exp(-EB/β)] with all thickness shows that the values of α, maximum hardness, are 21.6±1.0 kg/mm2 for SDR, 38.3±0.6 kg/mm2 for TEC and 45.3±2.6 kg/mm2 for EHD, and the values of β, rate parameter, are 0.40±0.06 J/cm2 for SDR, 0.77±0.04 J/cm2 for TEC and 0.58±0.09 J/cm2 for EHD. The radiosity of the bottom surface was calculated when the bottom surface of each material attained 80% of α of each material. The curing times for each material are in agreement with manufacturer recommendation for thickness. It is possible to estimate time needed to cure composite resin of known depth adequately by the radiosity and microhardness of the bottom surface.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Curing Lights, Dental , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Linear Models , Analysis of Variance , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Resin Cements/chemistry , Polymethyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Polymethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Polymerization , Hardness Tests
14.
J. appl. oral sci ; 24(4): 344-351, July-Aug. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-792588

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives The aim of this study was to characterise the new hydrophilic fissure sealant, UltraSeal XT® hydro™ (Ultradent Products, USA), and to investigate its in vitro resistance to microleakage after placement on conventionally acid etched and sequentially lased and acid etched molars. Material and Methods The sealant was characterised by Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), and Vickers indentation test. Occlusal surfaces of extracted human molars were either conventionally acid etched (n=10), or sequentially acid etched and laser irradiated (n=10). UltraSeal XT® hydro™ was applied to both groups of teeth which were then subjected to 2,500 thermocycles between 5 and 55°C prior to microleakage assessment by fuchsin dye penetration. Results UltraSeal XT® hydro™ is an acrylate-based sealant that achieved a degree of conversion of 50.6±2.2% and a Vickers microhardness of 24.2±1.5 under standard light curing (1,000 mWcm-2 for 20 s). Fluoride ion release is negligible within a 14-day period. SEM and EDX analyses indicated that the sealant comprises irregular submicron and nano-sized silicon-, barium-, and aluminium-bearing filler phases embedded in a ductile matrix. Laser preconditioning was found to significantly reduce microleakage (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.001). The lased teeth presented enhanced surface roughness on a 50 to 100 μm scale that caused the segregation and concentration of the filler particles at the enamel-sealant interface. Conclusion Laser preconditioning significantly decreased microleakage and increased enamel surface roughness, which caused zoning of the filler particles at the enamel-sealant interface.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pit and Fissure Sealants/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Dental Leakage/prevention & control , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission , Surface Properties/drug effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Statistics, Nonparametric , Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Fluorides/chemistry , Hardness Tests , Molar
15.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e9, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-768256

ABSTRACT

Abstract Radiotherapy for malignancies in the head and neck can cause common complications that can result in tooth damage that are also known as radiation caries. The aim of this study was to examine damage to the surface topography and calculate changes in friction behavior and the nano-mechanical properties (elastic modulus, nanohardness and friction coefficient) of enamel and dentine from extracted human third molars caused by exposure to radiation. Enamel and dentine samples from 50 human third molars were randomly assigned to four test groups or a control group. The test groups were exposed to high energy X-rays at 2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 5 days (10 Gy group), 15 days (30 Gy group), 25 days (50 Gy group), 35 days (70 Gy group); the control group was not exposed. The nanohardness, elastic modulus, and friction coefficient were analyzed using a Hysitron Triboindenter. The nano-mechanical properties of both enamel and dentine showed significant dose-response relationships. The nanohardness and elastic modulus were most variable between 30-50 Gy, while the friction coefficient was most variable between 0-10 Gy for dentine and 30-50 Gy for enamel. After exposure to X-rays, the fracture resistance of the teeth clearly decreased (rapidly increasing friction coefficient with increasing doses under the same load), and they were more fragile. These nano-mechanical changes in dental hard tissue may increase the susceptibility to caries. Radiotherapy caused nano-mechanical changes in dentine and enamel that were dose related. The key doses were 30-50 Gy and the key time points occurred during the 15th-25th days of treatment, which is when application of measures to prevent radiation caries should be considered.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Dentin/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/adverse effects , Analysis of Variance , Dental Caries/etiology , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Dentin/chemistry , Elastic Modulus/radiation effects , Friction/radiation effects , Hardness/radiation effects , Medical Illustration , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors
16.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e111, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951996

ABSTRACT

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of diode laser and a desensitizing dentifrice on dentin permeability. Fifty-two root dentin fragments were obtained (5 × 5mm) and treated with 24% EDTA gel. The samples were divided into 4 groups (n = 13): G1, control (no treatment); G2, diode laser (λ = 908 nm, 1.5 W, continuous mode, 20s); G3, application of abrasive dentifrice for 1 minute (Elmex Sensitive Professional (International Gaba); and G4, application of abrasive dentifrice for 1 minute followed by irradiation with diode laser. Ten samples per group were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 4h. The specimens were washed, longitudinally sectioned, observed under optical microscopy, photographed and assessed based on the degree of dye leakage. The remaining samples were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The leakage data were subjected to ANOVA test, followed by Tukey's t-test (α = 5%). Groups 2, 3 and 4 showed less dye penetration than the control group (p < 0.05), but were similar among each other. SEM images showed that dentinal tubules were open in G1, and fused and occluded in G2. Group 3 showed dentinal tubules that were occluded by the metal ions from the toothpaste. G4 presented similar characteristics to G3, and the presence of fused dentin. The diode laser and the dentifrice were effective in reducing dentinal permeability, and the combination of the two treatments did not show better results than either one used alone.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Tooth Root/drug effects , Dentifrices/chemistry , Dentin/drug effects , Dentin Permeability/drug effects , Dentin Sensitivity/drug therapy , Dentin Desensitizing Agents/chemistry , Surface Properties/drug effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Tooth Root/radiation effects , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Random Allocation , Reproducibility of Results , Dentin/radiation effects , Dentin Permeability/radiation effects , Laser Therapy/methods , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use
17.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e33, 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951972

ABSTRACT

Abstract The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of bleaching toothpastes, both conventional and those containing the new whitening agent Blue Covarine, on teeth previously bleached by conventional techniques (in-office and at-home). Squared bovine enamel/dentin blocks (6.0 x 6.0 x 2.0 mm) were randomly distributed in 6 groups (n = 15), according to the technique used to bleach them (in-office: HP35%; at-home: PC10%) and the type of bleaching toothpaste (none: control; Blue Covarine containing: BC; and without Blue Covarine: NBC). Experimental groups denominated HP35%, HP35%BC and HP35%NBC received in-office tooth bleaching before toothbrushing, and groups PC10%, PC10%BC and PC10%NBC were subjected to at-home tooth bleaching prior to toothbrushing. After bleaching treatment, groups HP35%BC, PC10%BC, HP35%NBC and PC10%NBC underwent daily tooth brushing in a brushing machine for 3 minutes (150 strokes/min, with a load of 375 g). Tooth color alteration was measured by reflectance spectroscopy (Vita EasyShade, Vident, Brea, CA, USA) at: T0 (baseline) - after in-office or at-home bleaching treatment; T1 - immediately after tooth brushing; T2 - 7 days and T3 - 14 days after tooth brushing. Data was analyzed by repeated measures mixed ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc test, with a significance level of 5%. Statistically significant differences were found between different experimental groups, evaluation times and for the interaction between them (p < 0.001). Tooth brushing using either bleaching toothpaste (conventional or with Blue Covarine) showed no color alteration on teeth previously bleached by in-office and at-home tooth bleaching. The use of bleaching toothpastes on previously bleached teeth did not produce a color alteration.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Tooth Bleaching/methods , Toothpastes/chemistry , Dentifrices/chemistry , Isoindoles/chemistry , Tooth Bleaching Agents/chemistry , Metalloporphyrins/chemistry , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Toothbrushing , Random Allocation , Single-Blind Method , Color , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Dentin/drug effects , Dentin/chemistry , Hydrogen Peroxide/chemistry
18.
Bauru; s.n; 2015. 83 p. ilus, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-794231

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o efeito da irradiação de dois tipos de laser (laser Nd:YAG e de Diodo) sobre um sistema adesivo convencional de três passos, utilizando três diferentes densidades de energia da ponta, na resistência de união imediata e após 1 ano. Foram selecionados 70 dentes humanos e cada um teve sua coroa seccionada, expondo a superfície da dentina necessária para os procedimentos adesivos e restauradores. Após o preparo dos dentes, os mesmos foram aleatoriamente subdivididos em 7 grupos (n=10), sendo 6 grupos-teste e um grupo controle. Na sequência, foi aplicado o sistema adesivo Scotchbond™ Multi- Purpose Plus e, antes de sua fotoativação, em três grupos, o laser Nd:YAG foi utilizado com 3 diferentes densidades de energia (1 509,55 J/cm2, 2 254,77 J/cm2 e 3 127,38 J/cm2), o mesmo procedimento com as mesmas densidades foi realizado nos três demais grupos com o laser de Diodo. Após a irradiação seguida da fotoativação, os dentes foram restaurados com incrementos de resina composta Filtek™ Z250. Os dentes restaurados foram então imersos em água deionizada e mantidos em estufa a 37oC por um período de 7 dias. Após o armazenamento, os espécimes foram seccionados de modo que se obtivessem palitos com área transversal de aproximadamente 1mm2. De forma aleatória, estes palitos foram separados em 2 grupos: o primeiro submetido imediatamente a testes de microtração em uma máquina de ensaio universal INSTRON 3342 e segundo submetido ao mesmo processo após 1 ano de armazenamento. Os valores de resistência de união foram submetidos aos testes ANOVA e post hoc de Tukey, para que comparações individuais pudessem ser realizadas. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os lasers utilizados. Os grupos irradiados com ambos os lasers apresentaram resultados similares ao grupo controle, com exceção ao grupo que utilizou o laser de Diodo com menor densidade de energia da (GD3), no qual o resultado foi inferior ao...


The aim of this work was to compare the effect of the irradiation of two types of laser (Nd:YAG and diode laser) on a conventional three-step adhesive system, using three different energy densities of the fiber tip in bond strength immediately and after 1 year. 70 human teeth were selected, and each one had the crown sectioned, exposing the dentin surface for the adhesive and restorative procedures. After teeth preparation, they were randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 10), being 6 test-groups and one control group. Thus, the bonding system Scotchbond™ Multi-Purpose Plus was applied, and before light cured, the Nd:YAG laser was used in three groups, with three different energy densities of the fiber tip (1 - 509.55 J/cm2, 2 - 254.77 J/cm2 and 3 - 127.38 J/cm2), the same procedures with the same energy densities of the fiber tip were performed for the diode laser. After irradiation followed by light cured, the teeth were restored with composite resin increments (Filtek™ Z250). The restored teeth were immersed in deionized water and maintained in oven at 37oC for 7 days. After storage, the specimens were sectioned in order to obtain sticks with crosssectional area of approximately 1mm2. Randomly, these sticks were divided into 2 groups: the first one was submitted immediately to microtensile tests in a universal testing machine INSTRON 3342, and the second group was submitted to the same procedure after one year of storage. The bond strength values were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests for individual comparisons. There was no statistically significant difference between the laser s. Irradiated groups showed similar results to the control group, except for the group that used the diode laser with lower energy density of the fiber tip (GD3), in which the results were lower than the control group in the immediate moment. Significant reduction in the values of bond strength were observed, except for the groups that used the diode laser...


Subject(s)
Humans , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin/radiation effects , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Laser Therapy/methods , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dentin/chemistry , Materials Testing , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Tensile Strength/radiation effects , Time Factors
19.
Bauru; s.n; 2015. 83 p. ilus, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-867433

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o efeito da irradiação de dois tipos de laser (laser Nd:YAG e de Diodo) sobre um sistema adesivo convencional de três passos, utilizando três diferentes densidades de energia da ponta, na resistência de união imediata e após 1 ano. Foram selecionados 70 dentes humanos e cada um teve sua coroa seccionada, expondo a superfície da dentina necessária para os procedimentos adesivos e restauradores. Após o preparo dos dentes, os mesmos foram aleatoriamente subdivididos em 7 grupos (n=10), sendo 6 grupos-teste e um grupo controle. Na sequência, foi aplicado o sistema adesivo Scotchbond™ Multi- Purpose Plus e, antes de sua fotoativação, em três grupos, o laser Nd:YAG foi utilizado com 3 diferentes densidades de energia (1 509,55 J/cm2, 2 254,77 J/cm2 e 3 127,38 J/cm2), o mesmo procedimento com as mesmas densidades foi realizado nos três demais grupos com o laser de Diodo. Após a irradiação seguida da fotoativação, os dentes foram restaurados com incrementos de resina composta Filtek™ Z250. Os dentes restaurados foram então imersos em água deionizada e mantidos em estufa a 37oC por um período de 7 dias. Após o armazenamento, os espécimes foram seccionados de modo que se obtivessem palitos com área transversal de aproximadamente 1mm2. De forma aleatória, estes palitos foram separados em 2 grupos: o primeiro submetido imediatamente a testes de microtração em uma máquina de ensaio universal INSTRON 3342 e segundo submetido ao mesmo processo após 1 ano de armazenamento. Os valores de resistência de união foram submetidos aos testes ANOVA e post hoc de Tukey, para que comparações individuais pudessem ser realizadas. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os lasers utilizados. Os grupos irradiados com ambos os lasers apresentaram resultados similares ao grupo controle, com exceção ao grupo que utilizou o laser de Diodo com menor densidade de energia da (GD3), no qual o resultado foi inferior ao...


The aim of this work was to compare the effect of the irradiation of two types of laser (Nd:YAG and diode laser) on a conventional three-step adhesive system, using three different energy densities of the fiber tip in bond strength immediately and after 1 year. 70 human teeth were selected, and each one had the crown sectioned, exposing the dentin surface for the adhesive and restorative procedures. After teeth preparation, they were randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 10), being 6 test-groups and one control group. Thus, the bonding system Scotchbond™ Multi-Purpose Plus was applied, and before light cured, the Nd:YAG laser was used in three groups, with three different energy densities of the fiber tip (1 - 509.55 J/cm2, 2 - 254.77 J/cm2 and 3 - 127.38 J/cm2), the same procedures with the same energy densities of the fiber tip were performed for the diode laser. After irradiation followed by light cured, the teeth were restored with composite resin increments (Filtek™ Z250). The restored teeth were immersed in deionized water and maintained in oven at 37oC for 7 days. After storage, the specimens were sectioned in order to obtain sticks with crosssectional area of approximately 1mm2. Randomly, these sticks were divided into 2 groups: the first one was submitted immediately to microtensile tests in a universal testing machine INSTRON 3342, and the second group was submitted to the same procedure after one year of storage. The bond strength values were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests for individual comparisons. There was no statistically significant difference between the laser s. Irradiated groups showed similar results to the control group, except for the group that used the diode laser with lower energy density of the fiber tip (GD3), in which the results were lower than the control group in the immediate moment. Significant reduction in the values of bond strength were observed, except for the groups that used the diode laser...


Subject(s)
Humans , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Dental Bonding/methods , Dentin/radiation effects , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Laser Therapy/methods , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dentin/chemistry , Materials Testing , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Tensile Strength/radiation effects , Time Factors
20.
J. appl. oral sci ; 22(1): 44-51, Jan-Feb/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-699917

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of dual-cured core build-up resin composites (DCBRCs) at 6 depths of cavity after 3 post-irradiation times by 4 light-exposure methods. Material and Methods: Five specimens each of DCBRCs (Clearfil DC Core Plus [DCP] and Unifil Core EM [UCE]) were filled in acrylic resin blocks with a semi-cylindrical cavity and light-cured using an LED light unit (power density: 1,000 mW/cm2)at the top surface by irradiation for 20 seconds (20 s), 40 seconds (40 s), bonding agent plus 20 seconds (B+20 s), or 40 seconds plus light irradiation of both sides of each acrylic resin block for 40 seconds each (120 s). KHN was measured at depths of 0.5, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 mm at 0.5 hours, 24 hours, and 7 days post-irradiation. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's compromise post-hoc test with a significance level of p<0.05. Results: For both DCBRCs, at 0.5 hours post-irradiation, the 20 s and 40 s methods showed the highest KHN at depth of 0.5 mm. The 40 s method showed significantly higher KHN than the 20 s method at all depths of cavity and post-irradiation times, except UCE at depth of 0.5 mm (p<0.05). The 120 s method did not result in significantly different KHN at all depths of cavity and post-irradiation times (p>0.05). In DCP, and not UCE, at 24 hours and 7 days post-irradiation, the B+20 s method showed significantly higher KHN at all depths of cavity, except the depth of 0.5 mm (p<0.05). Conclusion: KHN depends on the light-exposure method, use of bonding agent, depth of cavity, post-irradiation time, and material brand. Based on the microhardness behavior, DCBRCs are preferably prepared by the effective exposure method, when used for a greater depth of cavity. .


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Hardness Tests , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/chemistry , Materials Testing , Photochemical Processes/radiation effects , Polymerization/radiation effects , Reproducibility of Results , Resin Cements/chemistry , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL